Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Experienced Cruiser
|
All good points by everyone. As for ownership of Princess, the parent company is Carnival Cruise Lines, symbol CCL traded on the NYSE. The other major line publicly traded is Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, stock symbol RCL. NCL is owned by Star Cruise Cruises Lines traded on the Maylasian Stock Exchange. I have been in the securites industry for 25 years and know for sure that P & O is owned by Carnival. In fact CCL now owns the following cruise lines: Carnival Cruise Lines Holland America Princess Cruise Lines Seabourn Cruise Lines P & O Cruises Cunard Lines Ocean Village in U.K. AIDA in Germany Coasta Cruises P & O Australia Royal Caribbean owns: Royal Caribbean International Celebrity Cruises Pullmantur Cruises Star Cruise Lines owns: Norweign Cruise Lines America -NCLA Norweign Cruises Lines International Orient Cruise Lines Apollo which is a private equity management company injected $1 Billion into NCL and is now a 50% owner as of 1/10/2008. NCL has said the move is designed to strengthen its ability to expand as it competes with larger rivals Carnival (CCL) and Royal Caribbean Cruises (RCL). The cruise line said it plans a series of upgrades, including updated bedding in staterooms and an increased investment in food services of $50 million over a two-year period. The investment will also be used to pay down debt and allow the cruise line to fund its shipbuilding program. NCL has introduced eight new ships in six years and added another ship, the Norwegian Gem, in October 2007. The new NCL F3 class mega ship will be built and be on line in 2011, and these will carry 4300 passengers. We are NCL Platinum Latitudes ( sorry for the extra t) and because of the that status we have been treated royaly on NCL, compared to any other cruise line sailed. I am not pro NCL or any other line. I can only comment on my past cruise experiences between NCL, Princess, RCL Carnival etc.,.... and from our perspective NCL has always come out on top in our overall quality that we have found. The comments made are our opinions and we are not in the travel business and have nothing to gain by being somewhat NCL positive. As NCL Platinum members we have had the opportunity for intimate and private meetings with the executive staff, captains. Private dinners, special invitiations to be on the bridge with the Captain.....conversations regarding business, investments, world politics etc. We have not been able to do this on any other cruise line. Our voyages on NCL have become very personal cruises, unlike other lines. So we favor NCL and that should be expected. With the acquistion of Princess by Carnival, it appearent that CCL is the driving force of the cruise lines that they own. They are no different than a General Motors or Ford, that own diferrent model cars, but are owned by the same company. Policy and procedure of Carnival will and can flow from the Carnival brand to the other lines they own such as Princess. From my conversations with staff members on Princess the Carnival policies and procedures are already flowing from Carnival, and many have stated that there have been changes..thus changing the past reputation of Princess. Staff members on Princess recently had there work days entended from 11 hours per day to 13 hours per day, same as Carnival. The main question starting this thread was "NCL or Princess", and I felt compelled to give our opinions and commments of NCL vs Princess to hopefully help the poster in making a decision. I am sure that from the input here on cruise-chat.com, that poster will have a good idea from the vast array of opinions or experinces. I am not a expert in NCL because of the Platinum status by any means. I do however spend a lot of time reading securities research reports that are deep in industry trends, financials, changes in management, revenues, profitablity of the cruise industry, pricing, vacancy berth rates etc. I am employed with a major Wall Steet firm, and the amount of research material by security analysts is amazing and are packed with a wealth of information on the industry. For the serious cruiser who want to learn about any one cruise line, I highly suggest securing a security research report to learn about the various cruise lines. We have not encountered a 100% perfect cruise. So cruising is subjective. I personally believe that any cruise can be enjoyable and the cruise experience is based upon pre cruise expectations, and a solid after cruise evaluation. One can only compare one line to another only after several cruises. Enjoy, it's a great industry and this is a great web site, as we all have the opportunity to voice our opinions, comments, experiences whether one person agrees or not. Richard & Mary Las Cruces, New Mexico USA
Richard & Mary Las Cruces, New Mexico USA
We love NCL !!!
|
| |
|
Moderator Cruise Guru
|
Richard, You are still mistaking that Carnival Cruise Lines (the actual cruise line) owns Princess. It does not. A simple Google search of typing in Carnival Corportation and plc will bring up several websites. The first website that comes up should explain it all to you.
|
| |
|
Experienced Cruiser
|
Carnival Corporation & plc is a dual listed company with headquarters in Miami, USA and London, UK. Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc are separate listed companies and have different shareholder bodies, but they jointly own all the operating companies in the group. Carnival Corporation owns the majority stake.
Richard & Mary Las Cruces, New Mexico USA
We love NCL !!!
|
| |
|
Serious Cruiser
|
This February will be our first cruise on Carnival as I love NCL. From everything I have read I suspect there will be little difference except where it applies to formal dining. On the NCL cruise I recently took the wait for the main, formal dining room was zero wait for our table for two and our table for four on other nights when we dined with our friends. For those who love intimacy in a dining experience I suspect NCL is the ticket. For those who love dining with strangers in the formal dining Carnival would be best. I have cruised both ways and prefer freestyle but not so much that I would not go on either one. I select any cruise by destinations I want to visit and the rest takes care of itself.
Other than that I fully expect our upcoming Carnival Cruise on the Spirit to be just as enjoyable and I can guess that you'll love any cruise you select.
|
| |
|
Administrator Cruise Guru
|
Hi simphhcc. As you are deciding between new ships from both lines, I agree with marylb and f-mattox in their assessments of the differences between the two. I've also read and enjoyed Bob's review of his N. Jewel cruise. As for my own opinion, Princess is more formal than NCL, but not overly so. Princess also gives you the choice of traditional or Anytime dining (space permitting; request when you book), where NCL is anytime all the time. Entertainment, IMO, is excellent on both lines...lots of variation and of good quality. Kids would have a good time on either. Not that it makes a huge difference, but in selecting an NCL ship, Norwegian Pearl and Norwegian Gem are the two that have bowling alleys. The kids clubs are pretty cool on both lines' newest ships. Princess' ships have pools that can be covered in inclement weather -- I don't recall for the new NCL ships. (Bob?) One consideration in planning the cruise is the age of your kids as the two lines have different age groupings for the kids clubs. On NCL, the breakdown is 2-5, 6-9, 10-12, and 13-17. On Princess, it's 3-7, 8-12, and 13-17. Hope this helps.
|
| |
| Posts: 2445 | Location: Massachusetts, USA | Registered: December 17, 2005 |    |
|
Experienced Cruiser
|
Interesting topic. I guess we could be humble and say we have been on all the major cruise lines (including NCL and Princess) and spend about 10 weeks a year on cruise ships. Are we experts? No. But, we do have a lot of cruise experience and base our opinions on the recent cruises. NCL was my first cruise line (the old Sunward II) and the line has come a long way and is very innovative. The "Freestyle" concept was a great way to maximize on-board revenue (at least half the restaurants on any NCL ship have extra charges) and allow NCL to offer good quality in some of their venues. The new ships are lovely, but they do have a passenger-space ratio that puts them below many other lines. They market to a budget conscious crowd and they do it well. But, in terms of overall quality, service, etc. I do not even put them in the same class as Princess, HA, or Celebrity. Another issue is that since they market at such a low price point, it has some impact on the type of cruisers (if this makes me sound like a snob so be it!). Carnival used to go after this type of market, and has spent the past decade trying to convince cruisers that they are now more upscale. In fact, if you look at Carnival they even restrict younger cruisers unless they are married or have older chaperones. But, there are no such restrictions on NCL. Would we cruise NCL again? Sure! If we want a cheap cruise they are hard to beat. But for quality, longer cruises, and interesting itineraries we would look to Princess, HA, Celebrity and the other more expensive lines such as Crystal.
Hank
|
| |
|
Moderator Cruise Guru
|
Costa is a fun cruise line, it certainly isn't Princess class, but it is fun. The cabins are huge, even larger than our cabin on the Emerald. The Mediterranea was beautiful, very colorful, lots of interesting art, very easy to find your way, the shops had good prices, the food was so,so-some things great some not so great, but definitely worth the money. The ports of call were great, the staff really try to please, language can be difficult at times-not everyone speaks good English, but you can work with it. We had someone flush soap down one of the toilets that stopped up our entire floor, but it was corrected by the time we returned from our excursion. We didn't try the specialty restaurant. I prefer Personal Choice dining, but we had first seating and had great tablemates. I would definitely sail with them again, probably not for a longer cruise, but for a week it's a fun time. Not to ruffle feathers, but they are comparable to Carnival or NCL in my opinion. Princess is still my favorite. This is just an Oh, by the way. We had dinner at Ruth Chris's before our cruise, the steak wasn't half as good as the same cut of meat I had on the Emerald Princess at the Crown Grill (both petite fillets).
|
| |
| Posts: 4039 | Location: Alabama | Registered: November 22, 2005 |    |
|
Cruiser
|
A lot has been said but here's our experience, with some specifics. I thank all who post on this site. I've learned alot from you.
We're shoppers and choose a cuise more by ship, itinerary, embarkation port and price, rather than by line. We've enjoyed two 14-day+ Princess cruises (2004 Panama Canal on Regal Princess and last month Hawaii on Diamond Pricess--Hi to Rich and Mary! We enjoyed sailing with you!) and one back-to- back on NCL Sun, 2005, as well as Carnival and HAL. Enjoyed them all! Our philosophy is, "It's hard to have a bad day on a cruise ship!"
With that said, here's some specifics I'll add to the discussion: Both Princess and NCL can have very good value prices, especially if you follow the prices overtime at a web site such as VacationsToGO.com. Our best value to date has been NCL, so much so that we did 2 weeks back to back. On NCL we thought that they supplemented their good-value pricing by pushing drinks harder, but found that was also the case with Princess by 2007. We've learned to brush it off.
And our stateroom on Norwegian Sun was better appointed in that it had a couch and also the unusual touch of a coffee/tea maker. Our room on Diamond Princess was the smallest we've had yet. But that may be a ship-related issue, not a line-related issue.
Both had wonderful entertainment, but NCL had the Jean Ryan Dancers, who I think were the best singers and dancers we've seen on a ship; and they had Jane L. Powell, a perennial headliner for NCL who is such a superlative uplifting singer entertainer that I went to both of her shows one night!
Our dining experiences were both very good but there are subtle differences for each line:
Pricess has an "available every night" menu, so we get spoiled with lots of shrimp cocktails. NCL Sun had waffles every morning (9 waffle makers so you didn't have to wait) and free ice cream with lots of choices available almost all day. Diamond Princess didn't have waffles, the omlette station was out on the other side of 2 pools from the buffet and Princess really prefers to charge for ice cream at their "Sundaes" shop, only offering it free from 3-4pm.
Because NCL has so many dining room options they devote more of the ship's space to dining rooms and galleys. Some of the dining rooms charge but we always found excellent choices on the no-fee menus. And all of our servers went the extra step to make sure we were pampered. They didn't have to know us night after night to take good care of us. We did get to know some of them because they also work in the buffet and there you can chat with them a bit easier.
We enjoyed the flexibility of NCL's Freestyle dining, choosing many combinations of when to dine and when to go to the show. It worked great for us. For a large group it may make for too many decisions. NCL will of course set you up on a schedule if you prefer. We never had to wait for a table and on formal nights we enjoyed an intimate table to two. On Pricess we chose traditional dining but heard complaints from those on Anytime who were trying to get seated in the prime timeslots and get to the shows. If you want to dine late it seems not to matter much. If you want to dine early, traditional may be a better choice on Princess.
Pricess has a pool-towel system that I find not-so passager-oriented: In your cabin you get one pool towel for each person in your room to use for pools, steam rooms, beach excursions, hot tubbing, etc; you have to take your wet, sandy, yucky towels back to your room, where there's no place to hang them, and the cabin steward changes it for a clean one on their next shift. Other lines have bins by the pool and gangway stacked with clean towels and a place to get rid of the soggy ones. It didn't ruin my cruise and it's subtle. But the more people in the room, the more they are in the way.
The shore excursions were, in my opinion, more affordable on NCL. You may want to check out some comparisons on the lines' home pages before you pin down your choice if you're going to be paying for a family.
Norwegian Sun had no deck chairs on the Promonade deck, not a one! So it was hard to find shady spots to read, relax and view the ocean. There were plenty of deck chairs up top though and if you have a balcony room it may not matter to you. Again, probably a ship specific issue not a line issue.
Maybe I've been rather picky here but I'll close with reiterating that we've enjoyed them all and it's hard to have a bad day on a cruise ship! Let us know how it goes for you!
|
| |
| Posts: 22 | Location: New Mexico | Registered: November 06, 2007 |    |
|
Serious Cruiser
|
Simphhcc,
I have sailed on 3 differnet Princess Ships, Sun, Diamond, and Island. I also recently completed my 1st cruise with NCL onboard the Star. Both lines gives you the freedom to do the "casual" crusing but I noticed 1 major difference. NCL offers more dining options on board when compare with Princess, however most of the restaurant options on NCL charges extra fees where Princess only charges when you dine on Sterling Stakehouse (most ships) and Sabatini's. Also, if you compare the food offered at the buffet and the main dining room, if you dont want to spend extra money, Princess has more selections and better quality.
Hope this helps.
|
| |
|
Serious Cruiser
|
Another thing to be careful with NCL is the outlets. They only provide 1 110v outlet per room. All other outlets are 220v. If you plan to bring your computer, dvd player, cell phone charger etc... bring a converter with you so you wont run out of outlets. The converter can be purchased at Best Buys or Targets.
|
| |
|
Cruiser
|
We have never sailed with Princess, but just got back from a cruise on NCL Spirit and loved it! Staff bent over backwards to please, ship was beautiful and very clean. Food was great. Never had to wait over 20 minutes for dinner without reservations. I loved the automatic hand sanitation at the entrance to every restaurant. Highly recommend NCL.
|
| |
|
Cruiser
|
Generally folks you gets what you pays for! Price, ports, age bracket (obviously if you are of mature years you probably dont want to party! party! party! with the teenagers). The main ingredient I have found to a great cruise holiday is the attitude I take on board. All cruise lines have one great advantage over any other type of holiday, flexibility. Want to dress up, go for it, want to socialise, no problem, want to have quiet times watching the sea slip by, terrific, want breakfast in bed, it s yours, want to experience new people and places on your doorstep every couple of days. Want a romantic dinner for two, easy as. Nothing but nothing travel wise offers this degree of flexibility.
My worst cruise (memories of a fold out bed that followed the curve of the hull, slightly above the water line, you get the picture), was wonderful compared to the painful experience of zooming around Europe in a bus full of people 6 hours a day who I could not get 3 feet away from. Lousy hotel rooms, surly staff, indifferent meals!
Cruising is so affordable and what you get for what you pay is simply incomparable.
For the record I have sailed NCL but some years ago, Princess won me over about 4 years ago but if the itinerary interested me and the price was right I would try another line.
Once I have made my choice I intend to enjoy it!
|
| |
| Posts: 13 | Location: Canberra Australia | Registered: February 14, 2008 |    |
|
|