Cruise ship and port reviews from professionals and cruisers like you!
Search
CruiseReviews.com    cruise-chat.com    cruise-chat.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Port Chat  Hop To Forums  Alaska Port Chat    Ketchikan port fee

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted
Ketchikan has increased their port fees. It has gone up $1.00 pp. I thought fees just went up $50.00 pp (Alaska Fees) in January. $1.00 is not much and it will bring in $860,000.00 in extra money for the year!!
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Serious Cruiser
Picture of mickeyd
Posted Hide Post
Q on port fees~ Are you saying that they will not let you into their city unless everyone on the ship pays $1?


regards,
mickeyd
 
Posts: 94 | Location: TX | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Master Cruiser
Picture of Greyson
Posted Hide Post
Im not sure I understand port fees either, we never pay anything when we go there.
 
Posts: 684 | Location: St. Charles, Minnesota | Registered: July 25, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
We received a note in our cabin the first day. It said a $1.00pp port fee charge would be added to your ship's account. You had no choice... the ship had already left.
A dollar is not alot but it adds up, and Alaska just increased the charge by $50.00 per person.
in January
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Im not sure I understand port fees either, we never pay anything when we go there.

Greyson
When were you there last? I believe the fees just started this cruise year.
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Serious Cruiser
Posted Hide Post
Greyson, we sailed Princess to Alaska northbound and southbound this year (end of May, first week of June) and were not charged a $1 port fee for Ketchikan.
 
Posts: 65 | Registered: August 15, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Serious Cruiser
Picture of mickeyd
Posted Hide Post
quote:
You had no choice... the ship had already left.


...sounds more like extortion than a fee to me NoNo


regards,
mickeyd
 
Posts: 94 | Location: TX | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Cruise Guru
Posted Hide Post
There is a difference in the $50pp Head Tax and a port fee. The $1 port fee is a charge that Ketchikan is charging the cruise line for specific port related services. The $50 pp Head Tax was imposed by the state of Alaska simply for sailing on an Alaska cruise regardless of what port you visit. Those funds are used by the State of Alaska.
 
Posts: 2829 | Registered: December 28, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Cruise Guru
Posted July 04, 2007 02:47 PM Hide Post
There is a difference in the $50pp Head Tax and a port fee. The $1 port fee is a charge that Ketchikan is charging the cruise line for specific port related services. The $50 pp Head Tax was imposed by the state of Alaska simply for sailing on an Alaska


It is still a tax being charged to the cruiser. If I read the net correctly Ketchikan just increased their fees last yeat by two dollars, and now a dollar more.
They list their potential cruise guess at 853,654 for the 2007.
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Master Cruiser
Picture of Greyson
Posted Hide Post
We were there in Aug/Sept 2006. I dont care about $1, I cant go to a movie or anything else around here that cheap. Whats a dollar when you spend how much in excursions and souveniers anyway.
 
Posts: 684 | Location: St. Charles, Minnesota | Registered: July 25, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
There is the last straw or the straw that broke the camel's back
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Master Cruiser
Picture of Greyson
Posted Hide Post
gdjoslin, I didnt give you that straw did I? I wasnt trying to be a smart ass, just made a statement. Sorry if I did upset you, that was not my intention.
 
Posts: 684 | Location: St. Charles, Minnesota | Registered: July 25, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
Greyson
No you did not upset me. My words were probably used incorrectly.
Just do not like more tax, or fees.
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Master Cruiser
Picture of Greyson
Posted Hide Post
Thanks Gary, I agree, its getting tiring getting taxed on everything we did. So much for throwing the tea overboard. Just think how rich we could all be if we didnt need to pay taxes. Just exactly what are they for anyway except to line the big-wigs pockets. Geez, Alaska doesnt even have a state tax up there and my cousins get paid to live there. Dont figure!
 
Posts: 684 | Location: St. Charles, Minnesota | Registered: July 25, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Serious Cruiser
Picture of mickeyd
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The $1 port fee is a charge that Ketchikan is charging the cruise line for specific port related services.


Thanks for this clerification. It now appears to me that it is a cost of doing business for the owner of the ship.

Rather than absorbing the cost, they are just passing 100% of the cost to their valued customers.


regards,
mickeyd
 
Posts: 94 | Location: TX | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Cruise Guru
Picture of gdjoslin
Posted Hide Post
quote:
The $1 port fee is a charge that Ketchikan is charging the cruise line for specific port related services.


Thanks for this clerification. It now appears to me that it is a cost of doing business for the owner of the ship.

Rather than absorbing the cost, they are just passing 100% of the cost to their valued customers.


It is a part of business to make a profit, that means passing as much expense as you can down the line. Ketchikan is to blame here.

We had fish and chip at a place of the dock. The gentleman there said that the tax that was passed in 2005 and collected in 2006 hurt his business. He pays a business tax so the city got less from him. I am not sure what tax he was talking about however I picked up a "2007 cruise ship calendar" from the tourist center. On the back page it show visitors in 2005 at 921,429. In 2006 they were 838,880, that is 82,549 less people. Is the tax and the drop in visitors related? I do not know, we were there last year. I do not think it wise to bite the arm that feeds you.
I have sent this thread link to Visit-ketchikan.com. Perhaps they will provide some insight.
 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Near Yosemite, California | Registered: December 09, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  

Closed Topic Closed

CruiseReviews.com    cruise-chat.com    cruise-chat.com  Hop To Forum Categories  Port Chat  Hop To Forums  Alaska Port Chat    Ketchikan port fee

© All information contained in Cruise-Chat.com is the copyright of Internet Brands, Inc and may not be duplicated without the written permission of Internet Brands, Inc